My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

All other motorcycle related topics go in here." However, DO NOT post ANY messages that are related to politics or religion in here. They will be erased. Thanks!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
bimmerguy
Basic User
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 1:16 pm

My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by bimmerguy »

BMW costs more when you buy them new, they cost more when you buy them used.
When I ride, I still see old BMWs riding along, when I drive my BMW 325ci, I see 1980's BMW cars still going strong.
Germans over engineer everything they build, use weird but well thought out manufacturing.
"A driving experience " or riding experience is why they build BMWs.
Built for owner's enjoyment and safety, not just so sell units. Watch BMW vid of building new 6 series car and you can see the painstaking efforts they go to make every aspect of the car gel.
I will only drive BMW cars, I drive them for business and buy them with 100k on the clock and replace when they get to 250k.
I don't care if other drivers like my car , are impressed or think I'm rich. I'm not, I just know how to pick em.
I don't care if other riders like my bike< only I have to like it.
After 1 million miles in BMW cars, I have never been left walking when out of town.
My BMW bikes have never left me walking either. They remind me of how airplane engines are built: rated for 500hp but detuned to 200 hp for reliability.
When you want a bike that was built with the rider's enjoyment in mind, Buy BMW.
Even if you don't like it, you will get your money back.
And this forum rocks!
BoxerSteve
Double Lifer
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:40 pm
Donating Member #: 879
Location: Golden, CO

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by BoxerSteve »

bimmerguy wrote:My BMW bikes have never left me walking either. They remind me of how airplane engines are built: rated for 500hp but detuned to 200 hp for reliability.
BMW used to build airplane engines.

I agree, BMW's cost more but in the long run it's worth it.

I've always done pretty well when it came time to sell a BMW. Not so with the only Japanese bike I ever owned.

And the 2008 R1200R I bought only last weekend and have put about 450 miles on so far? I LOVE it. It is by far the nicest motorcycle I've ever ridden. It is an amazing machine. I love the engine! The more I ride it, the more I love it. It's not all that comfortable but I don't care, I love riding it so much.
deilenberger
Honorary Lifer
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: New Jersey USA
Contact:

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by deilenberger »

BoxerSteve wrote:BMW used to build airplane engines.
Ummm... BMW still does - they're named "RollsRoyce" aviation engines.
Don Eilenberger - NJ Shore
2012 R1200R - I love this bike!
User avatar
Faylo
Lifer
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:42 pm
Donating Member #: 978
Location: St. Charles, MO

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by Faylo »

BMW has always been about the total experience. The old airheads weren't the most powerful, but they were about the lightest and easiest handling bikes around. They still are. Once someone experiences the BMW bike, it stays with them, as it did me. My ZX11 is much quicker and faster than my R1200R, but not nearly as easy to ride. Thus, I choose the BMW.

But I'm keeping the Kawi for when I want a really good fright! :twisted:
-Jim
2010 BMW R1200R Alpine White (Need another. :()
1997 Kawasaki ZX11
1969 BMW R50/2 w/hack
dokotela
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 3:48 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Bedford, England

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by dokotela »

Faylo wrote: Once someone experiences the BMW bike, it stays with them, as it did me.
Well this is my first BMW. And I LOVE it. Not necessarily to look at, but more from the total buzz I get when riding it. It is a total pleasure just to pop out to the supermarket for some bread.

What I find interesting is that in the past I would park up, and spend time admiring the other bikes in the car park. Now I simply don't bother. The reason?

Because I just can't imagine owning, or wanting to own, any other bike than the R1200R. Other bikes leave me cold, particularly the Japanese machines. I still have a penchant for the Triumphs, but that thought disappears as soon as the R starts to move with me on it.

Just my thoughts...

Julian
2007 R1200R

Past lovers: Street triple, Sprint ST and RS, SV650
User avatar
ka5ysy
Triple Lifer
Posts: 1070
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:05 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Prairieville Louisiana

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by ka5ysy »

The mechanic that set up my RR out of the box in November 2006 (the dealership release day bike!) when I picked up the keys said something prescient:

"This is probably the only bike you will ever need"



Smart guy =D>
MSF #127350 NAUI #36288
2011 RT
WARNING: TEST RIDING THE R1200R IS HAZARDOUS TO YOUR FINANCES
boxermoose
Basic User
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:23 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Houston

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by boxermoose »

deilenberger wrote:
BoxerSteve wrote:BMW used to build airplane engines.
Ummm... BMW still does - they're named "RollsRoyce" aviation engines.
Nope -

Rolls-Royce Enginerring is still firmly British

The cars were spun off in the 73 and now Volkswagon owns then

BMW got the boody prize with Rover
TANSTAAFL
boxermoose
Basic User
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:23 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Houston

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by boxermoose »

boxermoose wrote:
deilenberger wrote:
BoxerSteve wrote:BMW used to build airplane engines.
Ummm... BMW still does - they're named "RollsRoyce" aviation engines.
Nope -

Rolls-Royce Enginerring is still firmly British - the joint venture with BMW on jet engines collapsed around 2000 - and RR took it over

The cars were spun off in the 73 and now Volkswagon owns then

BMW got the boody prize with Rover
TANSTAAFL
User avatar
bimmerguy
Basic User
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 1:16 pm

BMW did make airplane engines

Post by bimmerguy »

True,
That is where the BMW roundel came from { spinning propeller} engines for Luftwaffe.
CRazyCam
Basic User
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 1:29 am

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by CRazyCam »

dokotela wrote: I still have a penchant for the Triumphs, but that thought disappears as soon as the R starts to move with me on it.

Just my thoughts...

Julian
Hi Julian. Did you keep the Street Triple?

I find that having a really nice hooligan bike available is handy for when I don't feel like riding the "gentleman's conveyance" BMW.

But I love both of them.

regards,CrazyCam
rockbottom
Basic User
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:53 pm

Re: BMW did make airplane engines

Post by rockbottom »

bimmerguy wrote:True,
That is where the BMW roundel came from { spinning propeller} engines for Luftwaffe.

I don't think that's true. Plus, there was no Luftwaffe until until 1935. In World War I it was the Luftstreitkräfte
User avatar
bimmerguy
Basic User
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by bimmerguy »

Whupps,
List of World War II Luftwaffe aircraft engines - Definition

This is a list of all German Motors including all aircraft engines, rocket motors, jets and any other powerplants, along with a very basic description.

The RLM used an internal designation system that included a number signifying the engine type, 9 for piston engines and 109 for jets and rockets, followed by a manufacturer's code. Each company was assigned a block of numbers for their designs:

* 090-099 - various minor manufacturers
* 100-199 - Bayerische Motorenwerke GmbH (BMW); later changed to 800 block
* 200-299 - Junkers Flugzeug- und Motorenwerke A.G.
* 300-399 - BMW-Flugmotorenwerke Brandenburg GmbH (BMW-Bramo)
* 400-499 - Argus-Motoren GmbH
* 500-599 - Heinkel Hirth Motoren GmbH
* 600-699 - Daimler-Benz A.G.
* 700-799 - Klöckner-Humboldt-Deutz A.G.
* 800-899 - Bayerische Motorenwerke GmbH (BMW)
Dauntless
Lifer
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:56 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Millersville, MD

Re: BMW did make airplane engines

Post by Dauntless »

bimmerguy wrote:True,
That is where the BMW roundel came from { spinning propeller} engines for Luftwaffe.
The origin of the roundel is in dispute.

A BMW representative on the show "Twisted Throttle" which aired on the Discovery HD channel a few years ago stated that the blue and white on the roundel represents the flag of Bavaria.

I like the propeller theory better.
Paul
2009 R1200R
Steve H.
Basic User
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: BMW did make airplane engines

Post by Steve H. »

Dauntless wrote:
bimmerguy wrote:True,
That is where the BMW roundel came from { spinning propeller} engines for Luftwaffe.
The origin of the roundel is in dispute.

A BMW representative on the show "Twisted Throttle" which aired on the Discovery HD channel a few years ago stated that the blue and white on the roundel represents the flag of Bavaria.

I like the propeller theory better.
bmw did excellent aircraft engines !! Look Fokkerwolf 190 "long nose'' vs P51 mustang

regargs,Steve H.
Steve H.
Basic User
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by Steve H. »

deilenberger wrote:
BoxerSteve wrote:BMW used to build airplane engines.
Ummm... BMW still does - they're named "RollsRoyce" aviation engines.
I agree BMW is a german Rolls Royce!! Definetly better than original!Hallo guys,dont beleive it??? Tray it!!!

Steve H.
Steve H.
Basic User
Posts: 252
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:04 pm

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by Steve H. »

They are excellent,durable,for ever lasting bikes(with regular and no fussy maintenance).It can be destroyd in an accident only.Guess how I know!!??

Steve H. :( :)
AZBMWRIDER
Basic User
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 3:43 pm
Donating Member #: 1
Location: Tempe, Aridzona

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by AZBMWRIDER »

I first got involved with BMW bikes in 1981, bought an '81 R65, my second bike, still have it and it is a daily driver .

Got the '02 R1150R in August '02, yearend clearance sale, like has been said, it's the only bike I will ever need, does everything effortlessly, makes me think I'm a better rider than I really am .

A few airhead 'strays' have found their way to my garage over the past few years .

I don't know how many times I've heard from other make riders, 'you BMW guys never get rid of your bikes, you just keep them !! '

I also have one BMW car, my first, an '01 Z3 3.0i, 13 years and no problems with it at all .
'02 R1150R, Atlanta Blue
Been riding since 1979, BMW's since 1981 .
4 R65's, '87 Guzzi V65 Lario .
MarkShelley
Basic User
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:50 pm

Re: My thoughts on why BMW holds their value so well

Post by MarkShelley »

My first BMW was my 1100GS which I bought about 5 years ago and have put 40K miles on it. It now has 106K and still runs lovely. The build quality is amazing and I reckon the 1100 range was the best ever.
I also have an 1150R and I don`t think it is as well built as the 1100. I think the build quality has got progressively worse after the 1100`s.
I won`t be buying a newer BMW.
Post Reply