
I've learned if its from Dean, its reliable.
I think I'm waiting to trade in the F650 on this little baby.
Moderator: Moderators

Change is difficult for some. As you and I, and the rest of the geriatric set BMW riders are getting older, the company appears to be trying to attract some younger riders at a lower price point. While they still do not equal the japanese bikes in price, the F bikes are thousands cheaper than R and K bikes.Caroanbill wrote:Double-sided swingarm ...
Chain ...
conventional telescopic forks ..
How is this a BMW ? Or, rather, it might as well not be one.
I like the 800 twin motor, don't mind the forks (heresy?), didn't mind the brakes on the F800ST, like the ride position of the F650GS ...
... but why, since the frame is obviously derrived from the F800S/ST frame, didn't BMW fit the sigle swing-arm and belt drive? The system works very well indeed on my F650CS, and mates with F800STs say it's equally unobtrusive there. It's a point of difference, and a good one.
The answer (I guess) is that BMW is trying to entice Jap (crap) riders with a bike layout that's reassuringly familiar. Well, OK, but the press kit says - in essence - "OK, we give up. Chains are better."
Seems to me BMW now has a clearly differentiated premium line with shaft drive and tele/duolever. plus linked braking packages .. and the sub-1000cc line that might as well be whitgoods (ie any bike) - but for the price.
- The plus side is that I waited two years for the F800R before giving up and buying my R1200R - now this bike vindicates my decision!
- The downside is that if these 'whitegoods' fail spectactularly in the market (why buy a more expensive versuion of the universal bike?), we gotta hope they don't mean BMW's owners give up on bikes altogether
I agree (well apart from the geriatric bit - I'm a young 46Dan-A wrote: As you and I, and the rest of the geriatric set BMW riders are getting older, the company appears to be trying to attract some younger riders at a lower price point. While they still do not equal the japanese bikes in price, the F bikes are thousands cheaper than R and K bikes.
The F800S/ST does all that, but retains a couple of points of differentiation (swing arm and belt) ... there has been quite a yearning for an "R" in the same vein over on the F800.org and Chain Gang (Black Belt) websites. Many of us eschew chains with some vehemence (not necessarily with logicDan-A wrote: many at least don't mind, or prefer a chain or belt over a shaft, and many prefer the feel of a telescoping fork over the numbness of a telelever, despite the stability they offer.
.. being a kick to ride is the whole point, after all! I love my citybike F650CS probably more than my R12R ... the R12 is a great bike of character and competence .. the 650 is quirky, zippy (around town) and all about funDan-A wrote: my F800GS is a kick to ride, double sided swing arm, chain and all. (BTW, I also own a R1200R)