Hexhead vs Oilhead

This section is dedicated to the new Rockster version of the R1150R.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
ranmar850
Basic User
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:03 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Kalbarri

Hexhead vs Oilhead

Post by ranmar850 »

Hello all

just back from 16 days in New Zealand, which surely must rate amongst the greatest rides on earth. And it was on an R1200 GS, hired for the duration. I had a lot of choice, but opted for the GS to see what all the fuss is about. My wife was pillion; bike was fitted with 36 litre Givi panniers and a large topbox. We did 3,500Km in 15 days riding--nothing, some would scoff, and certainly very little by West Australian standards, some days were little over 100km to the next attraction, longest day was 500, most were about 300, (after a very leisurely start!) Speed limit in Un zud is 100km/hr, tolerance is reputedly 10 percent, and 40km/hr over will see on-the -spot confiscation! Roads are generally very grippy, and very winding; on anywhere but the few motorways, 80km/hr average can be optimistic. And nothing was passing me :D
Firstly, the GS has to be one of the most versatile rides around. Never a fan of upright riding positions, I was won over to this one. Screen and instruments initially seemed a long way off, but screen was ok without being totally tourer, a bit of wind noise around the helmet. 110 Km/hr was the usual speed, but I did one fair stretch on an empty road at 130-135, and it was totally happy. Power was certainly never a problem; it mostly lived between 2500 and 4500, and never seemed to need more--top gear would pull away strongly from 100km/hr --3500 rpm approx--up the steepest main road hill I could find. Remember, this is all two-up and well-luggaged. Towards the end, I tried a full throttle run thru the lower gears after a gentle take-off, and the front wheel was clear of the deck ALL the way thru the first two gears. There is a real surge above 5000, even in GS tune. I did one inadvertant wheelie coming out of a U-turn, purely on the throttle, never done that on the Rockster :D Handling was very good, firm ride with no wallow, great lean angles with nothing grounding, chuck it thru tight esses or bank it over on endless sweepers, nothing fazed it. ABS brakes seemed a bit soft compared to my Rocksters non-ABS , but none of the grabbiness at low speeds complained of with earlier BMW servo systems. Fuel consumption was 17-20km/litre (50-58 Imp MPG) of premium unleaded, excellent tank range. And I didn't miss a single shift.
As soon as I got home, I had to get straight on the Rockster for a valid comparison, before memories faded. It felt comfortably low, and short, easier to manouevre out of the shed. Off down the road, low wide bars felt decidedly weird, instruments and Wunderlicht screen seemed right in my face, leant gently into the first corner, and promptly turned around and went home to check the front tire pressure! :( It felt heavy & wanted to turn in overly, I thought. Nothing was wrong, it was just so different. Power felt flat, too, and this was solo. I loved this bike before I did the miles on the GS, and I guess I probably will again when I get the chance to do some miles on it. But be warned--if you decide to show this big trailie up, whether it be away fom the lights or through a bit of winding road, you'd better be prepared to go hard. Even if he is still on the stock Pirelli dual-purpose rubber--it sticks like S**t to a blanket. :shock:
User avatar
riceburner
Basic User
Posts: 3809
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:54 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Hiding in your blind spot....
Contact:

Post by riceburner »

I always find the 1200GS front end too "flighty" it always feels to me like it's about to float away and the bike fall over. Swing and roundabouts I suppose.

BTW, Rocksters WILL wheelie.... ;)
Non quod, sed quomodo.

A Rockster Life
rockster.ch
Basic User
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:50 am

Post by rockster.ch »

having just had a loaner 1200GS, I can say it's easier to wheelie than the Rock.... ;)

Also it does feel planted in corners with the profile of the rear and the front suspension giving a planted-but-distant type of feedback.

I was happy that I got my Rock back from service and that I chose it :)

edit: RB, the GS must be the only Beemer you've ridden and not totalled ;) :D
User avatar
fnfalman
Basic User
Posts: 650
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 7:01 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Southern California

Post by fnfalman »

I rode the GS as a loaner and I was very impressed by its cornering ability. It seems to lean over much easier and maintained the line better through the corner as well.
Cogito Ergo Vroom - I think therefore I ride.
03 Rockster, 07 Aprilia Tuono R, 07 KTM 990 Adventure
ranmar850
Basic User
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:03 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Kalbarri

Post by ranmar850 »

If I had a grumble with the GS, it was the VERY light steering at walking speed--I actually found it hard, at first, to keep it straight trickling thru traffic, tho this disappeared once speed was above this. Tracked perfectly at speed. Givi top box hanging out the back doubtless contributed to the eagerness to wheelie. Grounded the LH side once when a slight dip came up in a tight corner, going very hard. Rode the Rockster again this morning, strangeness of the front at low speed is beginning to fade for me. Original Dunlop is coming due for replacement, which is now probably more noticeable. Would I swap it? Tempting, but no;if the Rockster went, it would be for an R1200ST, probably. Tho the GS could be put to use on all the dirt roads not far from here, in what is generally known as The Outback. WA's part of it, anyway.
Post Reply